Suggestions and bugs

Share what you'd like to see next in NanoGPT or upvote ideas from the community.

Add a suggestion

Let us know what would make NanoGPT more useful to you.

Paste screenshots with Ctrl+V.

If unchecked, only the NanoGPT team will see this request.

New suggestions need approval before going public, and sharing lets others upvote your idea.

Showing

Status

Owner

Sup.Ai is doing something really cool that I bet you guys could implement. They give the user the ability to submit to multiple models, which you have, but instead of just returning the results, they pass all three results through a model to evaluate the responses and construct a consensus using the best aspects of each response. Then, they return the final consensus to the user. The idea is that while one model might hallucinate or write poorly, it's unlikely that they all would at the same time. I would love to, for example, be able to combine Deepseek, GLM and Kimi K2 or something like that. The biggest trick, here, would be how you prompt the final model to generate a useful consensus, but if you pulled it off, it would be incredible. Another advantage is that if a model is unavailable or unwilling to complete the task, another model will, so the user never experiences a dropped response.

Team reply

9/6/2026

We’ve added this as Fusion. Enable multi-model mode, choose the models you want to compare, then switch on Fusion and choose a Synthesizer model. It combines the model responses into a final answer. This can help compare and reconcile responses, but the combined answer can still make mistakes.

Updated 9/6/2026

1